Was DoD the Managing Agency for Operation Warp Speed?

Robert W Malone MD, MS

Pfizer did not commit fraud, but rather delivered the fraud that the US Government ordered

So, this is what went down. Money allocated to BARDA and HHS was directed (basically, it was MIPR’ed) from BARDA over to DoD, and this was then routed via the OTA pathway to Pfizer. As a consequence, the Pfizer OTA contract could be awarded and executed rapidly (by DoD), but technically it had to comply with the very lenient terms and conditions of a DoD OTA. Under this strategy, the Pfizer contract would have to fit within the confines of OTA authorization. Very open-ended performance specifications, only for demonstration purposes, and essentially no oversight and audit requirements for Pfizer. Could not be used for the acquisition of a final product. But someone must have made the decision that an OTA could be used for the acquisition of an “experimental” “Emergency Use Authorized” product. And there you have it. No specifications about the “safety and effectiveness” of the “demonstration” product. Pfizer delivered precisely what the US Government decided to purchase, because the USG was in a rush under Operation Warp Speed, and determined that a full FAR-compliant development and acquisition process would take too long. As we now know, the clinical trials designs and results of the “demonstration” product were manipulated, skewed, and intentionally misrepresented BY THE US GOVERNMENT, and the resulting product was neither safe nor effective for preventing COVID disease – which is what the FDA-authorized label claims. The FDA label says nothing about reducing disease severity. Hence the conclusion that “Pfizer did not commit fraud. It delivered the fraud that the US Government ordered.” Despite the reams of Pfizer data demonstrating that the product is neither safe nor effective, presumably including the new million pages of documents obtained by FOIA filed by Aaron Siri, Pfizer was under no contract obligation to share any of that data with the US Government – because the OTA contract did not require it.

You may also like these